<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WCF RIA Services Validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dotnetspeak.com/index.php/2010/01/wcf-ria-services-validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dotnetspeak.com/index.php/2010/01/wcf-ria-services-validation/</link>
	<description>All things .NET</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 05:11:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sergey Barskiy</title>
		<link>http://dotnetspeak.com/index.php/2010/01/wcf-ria-services-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey Barskiy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetspeak.com/index.php/2010/01/wcf-ria-services-validation/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>Sorry, it took forever to reply - I have been very busy.
No, I do not have it working with CSLA.  IMHO, I would not use both CSLA and RIA Services validation as they use different models for the same purpose.  I personally like CSLA validaiton better because it is more user friendly.  Let me know if you would like to discuss this further.
Thanks
Sergey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, it took forever to reply &#8211; I have been very busy.<br />
No, I do not have it working with CSLA.  IMHO, I would not use both CSLA and RIA Services validation as they use different models for the same purpose.  I personally like CSLA validaiton better because it is more user friendly.  Let me know if you would like to discuss this further.<br />
Thanks<br />
Sergey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://dotnetspeak.com/index.php/2010/01/wcf-ria-services-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotnetspeak.com/index.php/2010/01/wcf-ria-services-validation/#comment-868</guid>
		<description>I am interested in this blog post.
We are using CSLA, and trying to prevent user selecting SAVE if silverlight has marked input as invalid.  We have the XAML side working and user is given feedback (e.g. string entered in decimal field).  But because validation happens before value is passed back to the business object CSLA does not know that there is a validation problem and hence &quot;save&quot; is enabled and the last validated value is assumed on save.

Do you have example of your Validator.ValidateObject code working with CSLA - we could put something in our buttonclick event pror to calling CSLA provider.save?

Many thanks

Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in this blog post.<br />
We are using CSLA, and trying to prevent user selecting SAVE if silverlight has marked input as invalid.  We have the XAML side working and user is given feedback (e.g. string entered in decimal field).  But because validation happens before value is passed back to the business object CSLA does not know that there is a validation problem and hence &#8220;save&#8221; is enabled and the last validated value is assumed on save.</p>
<p>Do you have example of your Validator.ValidateObject code working with CSLA &#8211; we could put something in our buttonclick event pror to calling CSLA provider.save?</p>
<p>Many thanks</p>
<p>Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
